This site is for adults 18+ due to gambling/betting content. If you have a problem with gambling issues, or need information, please visit:
Gambling Help Online Gamblers Anonymous Gambling Therapy Gamble Aware Jugadores Anonimos JugarBIEN BeGambleAware GamCare

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Denmark-Sweden match regularity

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    the funny thing: when a game is really fixed,clearly aranged, there always are some people who say that the game isn't fixed and others bla bla,they don't know nothing about the arangement between teams or something between teams owners,coaches,players etc...but they scream out loud that the match wasn't fixed because they saw the game! imagine that! :lol: they saw with their own eyes and the game was fair...that's the advantage for those who play fake,there will be always good people who think everything in this world is fair and corect.it's a question of mentality and education at last. when you are corect you judge "corectly" everything you saw giving from the start " a non-guilty presumtion"
    this game was a fake one...it's so easy to play for 2-2 looking like you are f***ing far from any agreement...thats the question.for me as a bettor every game of this calibre is a must bet.and guess what? in a long run this is profitable,in the and that's the main target for me.and everytime where are clear facts that guide me for a "posible agreement" i take( without questioning myself) the bet! one thing i know: money is never enough,in the field and in the team's stuff there are people who needs money,not philosophers!!!

    P.S: divine punishment: 2-2 uselles,both teams failed in the next round
    (i'm joking )

    Comment


      #32
      If i had followed all the "hot tips" about fixed games the last months on BA, I had lost a lot of money.
      I remember a Bologna game that was "fixed for sure", and a lot of punters was gladly backing the draw to the ridicule price of 1,35 with high stakes, because "this was sure money and blah blah blah..." Well, game ended 3-1.
      Im not suggesting that fixed games doesnt exist. Problem is, that Im not familiar with either coaches, owners, players or the mafia and neither is one of you guys seeing fixed games everywhere. Point is, you are only guessing.
      Im not surprised, that a lot of people is seeing goasts because the Den-Swe game ended 2-2, and I dont really give a ****. But I really had a grat laugh, when someone serious was suggesting, that the Greece-France game was fixed because of the olympics... That was quite funny. :lol:

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by heart life of a colour TV
        the funny thing: when a game is really fixed,clearly aranged, there always are some people who say that the game isn't fixed and others bla bla,they don't know nothing about the arangement between teams or something between teams owners,coaches,players etc...but they scream out loud that the match wasn't fixed because they saw the game! imagine that! :lol: they saw with their own eyes and the game was fair...that's the advantage for those who play fake,there will be always good people who think everything in this world is fair and corect.it's a question of mentality and education at last. when you are corect you judge "corectly" everything you saw giving from the start " a non-guilty presumtion"
        this game was a fake one...it's so easy to play for 2-2 looking like you are f***ing far from any agreement...thats the question.for me as a bettor every game of this calibre is a must bet.and guess what? in a long run this is profitable,in the and that's the main target for me.and everytime where are clear facts that guide me for a "posible agreement" i take( without questioning myself) the bet! one thing i know: money is never enough,in the field and in the team's stuff there are people who needs money,not philosophers!!!

        P.S: divine punishment: 2-2 uselles,both teams failed in the next round
        (i'm joking )
        You are totally missing the point here. I have seen fixed gams and I have seen non fixed games, or at least I'm naive enough to think that I have seen it. So I assume that I can spot the diffrence, or when something fishy is going on. Maybe I can't, but then that's my loss. But I'm definetly NOT naive or stupid enough to think that everything is fair and correct in this world. Once again I've always claimed that fixed matches are being played, have been played and will always be played, and it has nothing to do with that scandinavians or any other are more honest or better than any one else, believe me fixed matches happens everywhere! I just go from what I see and I don't think it's that ****ing easy to fix a game without it showing, at least not when you have to stage four goals and the whole world is watching. Someone had a theory that both Denmark-Sweden and Italy-Bulgaria was fixed. That's just ridiculous. If that's true then Cassano should be able to score perfectly in every chance he get's. How can anyone seroiously think that the 2-1 goal was fixed? I know there's a clear diffrence in culture here and the truth probably lies somewhere in between, but in my opinion, it simply can't be that easy to fix games without having it looking rather suspicous.

        P.s. Divine punishment: Worthless Romania were no way near qualifying for the euro 2004. All that diving in the penalty area totally useless, team fails to qualify for everything. (I'm joking but the joke is just about as funny as a death threat )
        Only two things are infinite. The universe and human stupidity. And I'm not too sure about the first one... A Einstein.

        Comment


          #34
          Surprised this thread is still going on strongly. You guys are joking? One last time some thougts about it. To make one´s argument more than just a feeling you have to see the game. Those who watched it saw that Denmark winning 3-1 or more was much closer than 2-2 draw. I believe nobody can honestly deny it. So why to speak about fixed game? Just post your complaints to UEFA if you have any doubts. This is euro 2004 not serie B in final rounds. That game was enjoyable and both teams deserved to continue. And in quarterfinals they were a bit unlucky. Wouldn´t have been wrong if both of them were in semis.

          Might be that there was a fixed game in Africa some years ago. Didn´t see it so I cann´t be sure. It was last round in lower division. And the visitors were practically out of that division. To stay they needed a win but that wasn´t enough. If I remember it right they needed a 75-goal win. And that´s exactly what they got. Perhaps that was really fixed?

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Sergei
            Surprised this thread is still going on strongly. You guys are joking? One last time some thougts about it. To make one´s argument more than just a feeling you have to see the game. Those who watched it saw that Denmark winning 3-1 or more was much closer than 2-2 draw. I believe nobody can honestly deny it. So why to speak about fixed game? Just post your complaints to UEFA if you have any doubts. This is euro 2004 not serie B in final rounds. That game was enjoyable and both teams deserved to continue. And in quarterfinals they were a bit unlucky. Wouldn´t have been wrong if both of them were in semis.

            Might be that there was a fixed game in Africa some years ago. Didn´t see it so I cann´t be sure. It was last round in lower division. And the visitors were practically out of that division. To stay they needed a win but that wasn´t enough. If I remember it right they needed a 75-goal win. And that´s exactly what they got. Perhaps that was really fixed?

            Nice words... I am from Denmark and could not sleep last night It is hard - but anyway we will try again in VM 2006 - Thanks for the pretty words Sergei - and I am agree the game wasn´t fixed trust me.. Just see the match

            Comment


              #36
              Why was this thread opened at all? And why only on Den v Swe, not Ita v Bul!?!?
              People, you are not serious!
              Storia finita!
              :?
              MacotBet follow me on BA http://forum.bettingadvice.com/showt...=39806&page=34

              Comment

              Latest predictions

              Collapse

              Last posts

              Collapse

              Top Tipster Month

              Collapse

              Top Tipster Overall

              Collapse

              Favourite bookmakers

              Collapse

              BET365
              All-time favourite bookie of Bettingadvice.com due to their great betting offers in many sports, very good live betting and in-game cashouts, and general ease-of-use. Take me to Bet365!

              PINNACLE SPORTS
              Great bookie, offer superb odds (low margins), very high limits, does not slash winning customers. Probably the most reliable sportsbook on the net. Well known among sports punters for their ability and will to offer a fair product. Pinnacle will not hide. If you are good, you win. OK,  I'll give Pinnacle Sports a try!

              Working...
              X