POD Standings June/July 2018

[Macot]

*DON`T FORGET FOR TWO MONTHS COMPETITION YOU NEED TO POST 15 PICKS IN ORDER TO WIN!*
World Cup picks will not be allowed for this competition, we will run the separate WC POD!!

You will find standings for June/July competition here. As always, first three competitors will recieve 110 - 60 - 30 ***8364;.

GL!
Mac

1. aaaz 15 10-2-3 +714
2. Wtrylika 15 10-1-4 +698
3. Dex 15 10-0-5 +631
----------------------------------------------
4. Overeem 15 8-1-6 +491
5. hovi 15 9-0-6 +471
6. Louis 15 9-0-6 +469
7. pranav 15 9-0-6 +271
8. Jiveboy 15 8-0-7 +172
----------------------------------------------
9. BigRamy 15 6-1-8 -161
10. Gvdw 15 6-1-8 -268
11. Vossietheref 15 6-0-9 -287
12. ivan-dzo 15 4-0-11 -383
13. saab 15 5-0-10 -417
14. Pisac 15 5-0-10 -477
15. damir10 15 5-0-10 -536
16. CursedLuck 15 4-0-11 -693
17. gamblerbg 15 3-0-12 -898
18. adijuve 15 2-0-13 -1045
19. vividaniel 15 2-0-13 -1055
20. WiserthantheCrowd 15 2-0-13 -1063
21. Hoffenheim CL Winner 15 2-0-13 -1089
22. LiDi 15 2-0-13 -1090
23. Kane1910 15 2-0-13 -1100
24. Arbiter Elegantiarum 15 2-0-13 -1100
25. Quill 15 2-0-13 -1102
26. Cuore2010 15 2-0-13 -1117
27. al-gor 15 1-1-13 -1195
28. Nesquik 15 1-1-13 -1200
29. thebetmaestro 15 1-0-14 -1285
30. dajkula 15 1-0-14 -1290
31. Valverde 15 1-0-14 -1290
32. spirta 15 1-0-14 -1295
33. Cam 15 1-0-14 -1298
34. Serpico_re 15 1-0-14 -1300
35. lino 15 2-0-13 -1324
36. luzernhero 15 1-0-14 -1325
37. kicma 15 1-0-14 -1356
38. rogumu 15 0-1-14 -1400
39. Mindozas 15 0-1-14 -1400
40. KL1NCUNT 15 0-1-14 -1400
41. Macot 15 0-0-15 -1450
42. Jompy 15 0-0-15 -1500
43. sirac 15 0-0-15 -1500
44. WKSkofu 15 0-0-15 -1500
45. Hoffenheim CL Winner 15 0-0-15 -1500
46. hashishmaster 15 0-0-15 -1500
47. Analyst@ 15 0-0-15 -1500
48. spkutano 15 0-0-15 -1500
49. LimaMc 15 0-0-15 -1500
50. Anunnaki 15 0-0-15 -1500
51. edwardkenway 15 0-0-15 -1500
52. Sabelius 15 0-0-15 -1500

[Macot]

Picks from 1st to 6th June updated!
We have early leaders, good luck to all!

[Macot]

7th to 12th updated!
Dont forget, WC POD started!!

[Macot]

13th to 17th updated!
Please check results, there were some picks cancelled, you should check that.
GL
Mac

[Macot]

18th to including 25th updated!
GL

[Macot]

26th to including 30th updated!
GL

[Overeem]

Horsens won 1:2

http://forum.bettingadvice.com/showp...64&postcount=3

[Catalonec4ever]

It would be also nice to make an update Macot

[Catalonec4ever]

Simple, I don't agree with this. To check the previous threats, probably will some more situation like this one. But canceling the pick because of "too high odds" it's unacceptable. Come on, it's about breaking the rules? What's the point? To share mostly luckly winning picks, not depending on prize or respect the rules? How previously at POD, we do have the options to take bigger prize than rules suggest and in case we win the pick, it counts like maximum allowed profit by maximum allowed prize?

For 11.07, you have cancel two won picks by Valverde and me, because we have prize higher by 0.05?

I bealive that even at previous threats, I can found situations like this one where many tipsters failed to count profitable bet only by this funny decision taken from your side.

[Dex]

Simple, I don't agree with this. To check the previous threats, probably will some more situation like this one. But canceling the pick because of "too high odds" it's unacceptable. Come on, it's about breaking the rules? What's the point? To share mostly luckly winning picks, not depending on prize or respect the rules? How previously at POD, we do have the options to take bigger prize than rules suggest and in case we win the pick, it counts like maximum allowed profit by maximum allowed prize?

For 11.07, you have cancel two won picks by Valverde and me, because we have prize higher by 0.05?

I bealive that even at previous threats, I can found situations like this one where many tipsters failed to count profitable bet only by this funny decision taken from your side.

what in "Odds must be between 1.75 and 2.25" you find difficult to understand?
We all follow the rules but only you and Valverde not playing by the book?

[Louis]

Right.
"Odds must be between 1.75 and 2.25"
Rules are explained. wtf you need to choose odds more than 2.25?
Those new rules are here to play by the rules. Simple.
For example: if your pick is 2.35 odds, you should place pick with smaller odds but with the same pick.
-over 2.5 is 2.35? you bet on over 2.25 on 2.10 odds. for POD.
-HW -1.0 is 2.45? you bet on HW -0.75 on 2.17 odds. for POD.

Reason is to bet with same stakes on real bet, not just to chase prize on BA.
People who follow your picks will understand.

[Catalonec4ever]

"Reason is to bet with same stakes on real bet, not just to chase prize on BA." - Really? Using a prize by one of the best online bookies which over 0.05 more and due rules, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE because is higher, sounds like chasing prize? Maybe for you but not for me.

[Catalonec4ever]

what in "Odds must be between 1.75 and 2.25" you find difficult to understand?
We all follow the rules but only you and Valverde not playing by the book?

Yes, only me and Valverde don't playing under the rules because we're the smartest guys here. Relax Dex, don't take your opinion by your wish. Next time, you will have a nice bet by bigger prize from "the rules" and I will really don't care if the prize is higher or smaller, as far as your bet is good. And will re-call my post again, defending your nice work not depending on prize suggestion because, at the and of your bet, you know by the rules, how maximum you can profit from it.

[Dex]

Yes, only me and Valverde don't playing under the rules because we're the smartest guys here. Relax Dex, don't take your opinion by your wish. Next time, you will have a nice bet by bigger prize from "the rules" and I will really don't care if the prize is higher or smaller, as far as your bet is good. And will re-call my post again, defending your nice work not depending on prize suggestion because, at the and of your bet, you know by the rules, how maximum you can profit from it.

If the odd is higher that 2,25 then I simply don't play that and find another way to be in the rules or choose another event.

Is this that hard to swallow?

[Louis]

"Reason is to bet with same stakes on real bet, not just to chase prize on BA." - Really? Using a prize by one of the best online bookies which over 0.05 more and due rules, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE because is higher, sounds like chasing prize? Maybe for you but not for me.

f**k your +0.000000005 higher bet.

Rules are the rules.

2.25 is the limit. It is said.

How you don't understand that?